##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The school curriculum clearly defines that the main purpose of elementary physical education is to help students develop positive attitudes towards physical education, engage in lifetime physical activity through the development of knowledge and skills, develop an integrated personality and cultivate moral and social values. How close are elementary children to the above purpose? Is this achieved through elementary physical education class? The purpose of the study was to examine the teaching efficiency or inefficiency of classroom teachers when teaching physical education, from the perspective of time. For that purpose, 30 elementary school teachers (18 female and 12 male) from public schools all over Cyprus were randomly selected to participate in this study. Participating teachers were assigned to teach physical education in their schools. Teachers were asked to give 2 dates on which school visits to schools were scheduled to attend their courses and collect data related to their teaching, such as time management, presentation of activities, organization of children and equipment, feedback provided and others. For data collection purposes a previously validated recording instrument designed by Silverman, Subramaniam, & Woods (1998) was used. The teacher behavior instrument required the coder to collect data on both instructional behaviors (e.g., explanation, demonstration, and monitoring) and organizational behaviors (e.g., children organization and equipment organization). In addition, informal semi-structured interviews with the teachers were also conducted, in order to learn about their beliefs about teachers’ behaviors in class and the value they give to them, such as organizational behaviors and others. The descriptive statistical analysis revealed data that show in principle the diversity, from class to class, in the variables that have been studied. The most important factor, however, is the ineffective use of the available class time, which negatively affected the components of a physical education course, such as the consumption of a large part of the time in organizational or other processes while deducting time that could be offered to the children for more physical activity, more efforts, and probably better learning. Data analysis revealed four important themes that should be of concern to those involved with physical education: 1) The need for better time management, 2) The need to improve the teaching and organizational factors of the class, 3) The need for feedback to students during practice time, and 4) The need for final assessment when at the end of the class.

References

  1. Anderson, W.G. (1989). Curriculum and program research in physical education: Selected approaches. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 8, 113-122.
     Google Scholar
  2. Ashy, M., Lee, A., & Landin, D. (1988). Relationship of practice using correct technique to achievement in a motor skill. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 7, 115-120.
     Google Scholar
  3. Behets, D. (1997). Comparison of more and less effective teaching behaviors in secondary physical education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(1), 215-224.
     Google Scholar
  4. Beauchamp, L., Darst, P.W., & Thompson, L.P. (1990). Academic learning time as an indication of quality high school physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 61, 92-95.
     Google Scholar
  5. Brophy, J. (1982). Successful teaching strategies for the inner-city child. Phi Delta Kappa, 63, 527-530.
     Google Scholar
  6. Constantinides, P., & Silverman, S. (2018). Cypriot elementary students attitudes towards physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education (JTPE), 37, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2016-0235.
     Google Scholar
  7. Constantinides, P., Montalvo, R., & Silverman, S. (2013). Teaching processes in elementary physical education classes taught by specialists and nonspecialists. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 68-76.
     Google Scholar
  8. Faucette, N., & Hillidge, S.B. (1989). Reasearch findings-PE Specialists and classroom teachers. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 7, 51-54.
     Google Scholar
  9. Faucette, N., McKenzie, T.L., & Patterson, P. (1990). Descriptive analysis of nonspecialist elementary physical education teachers’ curricular choices and class organization. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 9, 284-293.
     Google Scholar
  10. Faucette, N., Nugent, P., Sallis, J.F., & McKenzie, T. (2002). “I’d rather chew on aluminum foil.” Overcoming classroom teachers’ resistance to teaching physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 287-308.
     Google Scholar
  11. Faucette, N., & Patterson, P. (1989). Classroom teachers and physical education: What they are doing and how they feel about it. Education, 110,108-114.
     Google Scholar
  12. Faucette, N., & Patterson, P. (1990). Comparing teaching behaviors and student activity levels in classes taught by P.E. specialists versus nonspecialists. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 9, 106-114.
     Google Scholar
  13. Goc-Karp, G., & Zakrajsek, D.B. (1987). Planning for learning-theory into practice? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 6, 377-392.
     Google Scholar
  14. Graham, G. (1991). An overview of TECPEP. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10, 323-334.
     Google Scholar
  15. Graham, G., & Heimerer, E. (1981). Research on teacher effectiveness: A summary with implications for teaching. Quest, 33, 14-25.
     Google Scholar
  16. Graham, G., Soares, P., & Harrington, W., (1983). Experienced teachers’ effectiveness with intact classes: An ETU study. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2, 3-14.
     Google Scholar
  17. Harrison, J.M. (1987). A review of the research on teacher effectiveness and its implications for current practice. Quest, 39, 36-55.
     Google Scholar
  18. Hastie, P.A. (1994). Selected teacher behaviors and student ALT-PE in secondary school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 242-259.
     Google Scholar
  19. Housner, L.D., & Griffey, D.C. (1985). Teacher cognition: Differences in planning and interactive decision making between experienced and inexperienced teachers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56, 45-53.
     Google Scholar
  20. Lee, A.M., Landin, D.K., & Carter, J.A. (1992). Student thoughts during tennis instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 256-267.
     Google Scholar
  21. Lohaphaiboonkun, P. (2011). Survey on the opinions of the use for physical education curriculum. Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 2(1), 100-110.
     Google Scholar
  22. Luke, M.D. (1989). Research on class management and organization: Review with Implications to current practice. Quest, 41, 55-67.
     Google Scholar
  23. McKenzie, T., Clark, E., & McKenzie, R. (1984). Instructional strategies: Influence on teacher and student behavior. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 3, 20-28.
     Google Scholar
  24. McKenzie, T.L., Feldman, H., Woods, S.E., Romero, K.A., Dahlstrom, V., Stone, E.J., Strikmiller, P.K., Williston, J.M., & Harsha, D.W. (1995). Student activity level and lesson context during third-grade physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 184-193.
     Google Scholar
  25. Metzler, M. (1989). A review of research on time in sport pedagogy. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 8, 87-103.
     Google Scholar
  26. Ministry of Education , Culture and Sports (2010). Elementary School Curriculum. http://archeia.moec.gov.cy/mc/2/fysiki_agogi.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  27. Philips, D., & Carlisle, A. (1983). A comparison of physical education teachers compared as least and most effective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2, 55-67.
     Google Scholar
  28. Placek, J.H., & Randall, L. (1986). Comparison of academic learning time in physical education: Students of specialists and nonspecialists. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 5, 157-165.
     Google Scholar
  29. Placek, J., Silverman, S., Shute, S., Dodds, P., & Rife, F. (1982). Academic learning time in a traditional elementary physical education setting: A descriptive analysis. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 17, 41-47.
     Google Scholar
  30. Rikard, L. (1991). The short term relationship of teacher feedback and student practice. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10(3), 275-285.
     Google Scholar
  31. Rink, J. (1994). Task presentation in pedagogy. Quest, 46, 270-280.
     Google Scholar
  32. Rink, J. (1996). Tactical and skill approaches to teaching sport and games. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15 (4), 397-398. http://journals.humankinetics.com/jtpe-contents
     Google Scholar
  33. Rink, J. (2003). Effective instruction in physical education. In S. Silverman & C. Ennis, eds. Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction (2nd ed., pp. 165-186). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
     Google Scholar
  34. Rink, J. & Werner, P. (1987). Student responses as a measure of teacher effectiveness. In G. Barrette, R. Feingold, C. Rees & M. Pieron (Eds.), Myths, models and methods in sport pedagogy (p. 199-206). Champaign, IL. Human Kinetics.
     Google Scholar
  35. Rovegno, I. (1992). Learning a new curricular approach: Mechanisms of knowledge acquisition in preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 253-264.
     Google Scholar
  36. Rovegno, I. (1998). The development of in-service teachers' knowledge of a constructivist approach to physical education: Teaching beyond activities. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 147-162.
     Google Scholar
  37. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Beets MW, Beighle A, Erwin H, Lee S. (2012). Physical education's role in public health: steps forward and backward over 20 years and HOPE for the future. Research Quartelry for Exercise & Sport, 83(2):125-35. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599842. PMID: 22808697; PMCID: PMC6036633.
     Google Scholar
  38. Savva, S.C., Kourides, Y.A., Hadjigeorgiou, C., & Tormaritis, M.J. (2014). Overweight and obesity prevalence and trends in children and adolescents in Cyprus 2000– 2010. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 8, e426– e434. doi:10.1016/j.orcp.2013.11.005.
     Google Scholar
  39. SHAPE America's National Standards & Grade-Level Outcomes for K-12 (2013). National Physical Education Standards. https://www.shapeamerica.org/standards/pe/
     Google Scholar
  40. Silverman, S. (1988). Relationships of selected presage and context variables to achievement. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 35-41.
     Google Scholar
  41. Silverman, S., Tyson, L., & Krampitz, J. (1992). Teacher feedback and achievement in physical education. Interaction with student practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 333-344.
     Google Scholar
  42. Silverman, S., Tyson, L.S., & Morford, L.M. (1988). Relationships of organization, time, and student achievement in physical education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4, 247-257.
     Google Scholar
  43. Silverman, S., Subramaniam, P.R., & Woods, A.M. (1998). Task structures, student practice, and skill in physical education. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 298-306.
     Google Scholar
  44. US Department of Health and Human Services (2018). Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: Healthy People 2030.
     Google Scholar
  45. Washington, DC. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/physical-activity/increase-proportion-children-who-do-enough-aerobic-physical-activity-pa-09
     Google Scholar
  46. Werner, P., & Rink, J. (1989). Case studies of teacher effectiveness in second grade physical education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 333- 344.
     Google Scholar
  47. World Health Organization (2020). Physical Activity. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity.
     Google Scholar